+---------------------------------------------------[ BEGIN MESSAGE ]-+
TO: All
SUBJECT: Test
Testing from the actual server. We'll see if this goes. +---------------------------------------------------[ CONTROL LINES ]-+ DATE: 2025-11-30 13:42:38
MSGID: 21:3/222 bd521faf
PID: gettossed 0.1
TID: gettossed 0.1 +------------------------------------------------------------[ PATH ]-+ PATH: 21:3/222.0@fsxnet +----------------------------------------------------------[ ORIGIN ]-+ Angstridden BBS - fsxNet (21:3/222.0) +-----------------------------------------------------[ END MESSAGE ]-+
PID: gettossed 0.1This automated reply shows the PID and TID being the same. However, his original message shows 'clrghouz' as the TID.
TID: gettossed 0.1
Should clrghouz be modifying the tosser ID of the original message?
As long as my hacked together bbs and mail tosser aren't doing
something they shouldn't! lol
Should clrghouz be modifying the tosser ID of the original message?
IMHO, yes.
The PID represent the source program that created the message - and
should only be added by the source.
The TID represents the tosser that put the message into network, and
should be changed by the tosser sending the message on.
(Well thats how I interpret it).
http://ftsc.org/docs/fsc-0046.005
So, the TID from the source to clrghouz (which clrghouz quotes in its
reply, would be that of the origin [to clrghouz]).
The TID downstream (uplinks and other downlinks from clrghouz) would
have clrghouz's ID in it, because it changed the message (normally
adding additional SEEN-BYs and PATH).
I'm going to use these values to build up some stats to see if it can
show who uses what...
It's all new code not using any established BBS/binkd/tosser.
It should follow specs but I've found that they aren't all clear lol.
| Sysop: | HM Derdoc |
|---|---|
| Location: | SKY NET |
| Users: | 38 |
| Nodes: | 9 (1 / 8) |
| Uptime: | 08:09:16 |
| Calls: | 538 |
| Calls today: | 7 |
| Files: | 2 |
| D/L today: |
3 files (14K bytes) |
| Messages: | 12,563 |