The Serial Port decided to see if it was possible to stream a YouTube video over a dialup connection. Of course a single 56k connection wouldn't suffice, so they tried out Multilink Point-to-Point Protocol (MLPPP).
Check our their journey here:
https://youtu.be/LZ259Jx8MQY
Loved this video - I'd never heard of binding modems together, before... kinda wish I'd of thought of that in 1997!
The Serial Port decided to see if it was possible to stream a YouTube video over a dialup connection.
It was definitely a thing, and people did it with ISDN and other types of lines, too... but the ISP had to be set up to support it.
Bob Worm wrote to phigan <=-
It was definitely a thing, and people did it with ISDN and other types of lines, too... but the ISP had to be set up to support it.
Yeah, link bonding works well if you know all of your connections land
on the same device at the head end, less so if you are dialing a
virtual number and hitting random devices all over the place.
Heh, that's weird. I know T1 circuits over there are / were smaller than E1 over here (1.544 Mbps vs 2Mbps) but I thought that was because you have 24 x 64k channels in a T1 as opposed to 30 x 64k in an E1.
nail both channels up to the LAN
Rover to get 112kb/sec of internet goodness.
The worst of both worlds, if you like :) That's interesting, because over here if you used an E1 for primary rate ISDN you got 30x64K plus separate signalling, it was often called "an ISDN 30". How does it work if you use a T1 for terminating ISDN calls (assuming you can / could)?
| Sysop: | HM Derdoc |
|---|---|
| Location: | SKY NET |
| Users: | 38 |
| Nodes: | 9 (1 / 8) |
| Uptime: | 07:14:13 |
| Calls: | 538 |
| Calls today: | 7 |
| Files: | 2 |
| D/L today: |
3 files (14K bytes) |
| Messages: | 12,563 |